Dealing with Bored Students

I think this InsideHigherEd.com column(HT: Reynolds) has a valuable little lesson for all teachers:

Some professors threaten to confiscate students’ cell phones if they go off during class. Laurence Thomas has his own approach to classroom distractions. If the philosopher at Syracuse University catches a student sending text messages or reading a newspaper in class, he’ll end the class on the spot and walk out. It doesn’t matter if there is but one texter in a large lecture of hundreds of students. If you text, he will leave.

Last week, when a student in a large lecture — in the front row no less — sent a text message, Thomas followed through on his threat (as he had done just a few days earlier). And he then sent the university’s chancellor, his dean, and all of the students an e-mail message explaining his actions and his frustration at the “brazen” disrespect he had received in class. In the e-mail, he noted that the student who sent the text message is Cuban, and that last year, two Latino students had started to play tic-tac-toe during his class.

Set aside the race issues that have gotten bollized up with this incident. It’s still an over-reaction by the professor. Students have been bored forever. And they’ve found ways of idling away the time forever. I suspect some of Socrates’ students passed notes back and forth. I got kicked out of a law school course - not just a class session, but the whole course - for doing a crossword puzzle in class. (My students have a hard time believing a prof could do that and today most profs probably wouldn’t have the stones to do it. I don’t) Texting or web surfing or what have you is just the up to date version of an age-old problem.

This issue is not going to go away. In fact, it’s going to get more common as the so-called Millenials move through the system. For Millenials, multi-tasking is a way of life and staying connected 24/7 via text messaging, IMs, and email is preceived as an inherent right.

Having learned that yelling at a class does little but generate really negative student evaluations, I long ago decided to draw a distinction between stuff like texting and conduct that actually disrupts the classroom experience. Ignore the little stuff but be tough on stuff that matters.

Personally, I find that injecting a little humor and keeping the pace up is pretty much all that’s necessary to deal with the little stuff.

Posted on Wednesday, April 02 2008 | Permalink

I wonder how those profs who threaten to confiscate cell phones think that would actually work in practice.  Are they going to wrest it from the student’s grasp if he refuses to give it up?  Are they going to give him a failing grade or expel him from the course unless he forfeits his phone?  I think a prof who tries any of those things is just asking for way more trouble than he really needs.  Sending text messages isn’t any more disruptive than reading a magazine, doing crosswords or nodding off.  So save the threats for actual disruption - talking on cell phones and that sort of thing.

Posted by  on  04/02  at  06:27 PM

I had a prof in undergrad that walked out on a class.  I remember it being over something petty.  That prof was not well liked.

Student behavior was always worse in large lectures and not seminars.  During lawschool, there was much bitterness about paying a large sum of money to sit in a huge lecture hall.  Most of my classmates decided that they were not paying for an education but for the school’s brand name.  Once they came to that conclusion, it was much easier work crossword puzzles and read last night’s box scores.

Posted by  on  04/02  at  07:36 PM
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Introduction


Recent Law & Business Entries


Hot Topics on Food & Wine

Hot Topics on Punditry



Punditry RSS Feed

Archives

My Books




Blogroll